Mark BR wrote:
> sean wrote in message
> news:414a0145$0$20246$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com...
>
>>poster wrote:
>>
>>>On 16 Sep 2004 in uk.telecom, PiePlanter wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Occasionally we miss a call and dont recognise the number retrieved on
>
> BT
>
>>>>1471. Is there an alternative to ringing them back to find out who
>
> called?
>
>>>
>>>Just consider it a wrong number and forget it. If they really want you
>
> they
>
>>>will likely ring back, finding you in or leaving a message. The old
>
> saying
>
>>>When you ring a wrong number, why is it never engaged ? is proven
>
> :-)
>
>>Well, my aunt, who is not that clever was ringing a wrong number, dont
>
> know how
>
>>it happened but she ended up having her own number on the paper, not the
>>plumbers, so it was always engaged! She was phoning herself :P
>
>
> Good job she didnt have BT answer or she would have been leaving a message
> for herself (and paying for the privilege)
>
> Mark BR
>
>
HAHA, yeah, true