TELECOM 247

> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:22:18 +0000, R. Mark Clayton wrote:
>
> > Graham. wrote in message
>
> >> There is a lot of this law breaking going on if you are correct.
>
> > Not sure it is the law, but AIUI BT rejects calls with bogus CLI.
>
> Presumably if youre presenting bogus CLI in order to deceive then
thats
> already covered by laws on fraud.

> alexd wrote
>
>> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:22:18 +0000, R. Mark Clayton wrote:
>>
>>> Graham. wrote in message
>>
>>>> There is a lot of this law breaking going on if you are correct.
>>
>>> Not sure it is the law, but AIUI BT rejects calls with bogus CLI.
>>
>> Presumably if youre presenting bogus CLI in order to deceive then
>> thats already covered by laws on fraud.
>
> Not in England. There may be proposals to extend coverage but most
> current laws say dishonestly or in order to gain a pecuniary
> advantage so just deception isnt usually enough nor even intention
> to bypass Choose To Refuse or ACR.
>
> And I posted here about getting calls from 020 2222 2222 and 1111 so
> BT doesnt prevent fakes passing over their network nor is there any
> obvious way of complaining.

> alexd wrote
>
>> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:22:18 +0000, R. Mark Clayton wrote:
>>
>>> Graham. wrote in message
>>>> There is a lot of this law breaking going on if you are correct.
>>> Not sure it is the law, but AIUI BT rejects calls with bogus CLI.
>> Presumably if youre presenting bogus CLI in order to deceive then
> thats
>> already covered by laws on fraud.
>
> Not in England. There may be proposals to extend coverage but most
> current laws say dishonestly or in order to gain a pecuniary
> advantage so just deception isnt usually enough nor even intention to
> bypass Choose To Refuse or ACR.
>
> And I posted here about getting calls from 020 2222 2222 and 1111 so BT
> doesnt prevent fakes passing over their network nor is there any
> obvious way of complaining.